The
difference between the pre-literate acoustic world and the
alphabetical visual world is that according to the text “is the
world viewed through pre-literate eyes is a world of no boundaries in
which information emerges not from fixed positions but anywhere and
everywhere. It is the world of music, myth, and total immersion”,
while the alphabetical visual world is in the form of television and
lacks perspective or distance from it's subjects. Television becomes
a part part of the acoustic world because it is also a musical,
mythic, and immersive form.
2) Why
does the alphabet have the segregating tendencies? How exactly
does the printing press reverse the segregating tendencies?
The
alphabet had segregating tendencies because of it's origin as a
solitary medium, texts that were usually readable by no more then
one set of eyes at one time, and capable of being copied only by
dint of someone transcribing page per page as the text says. The
printing press reverses the segregating tendencies by having more
then one copy of alphabetical texts available to many more then one
person and to public’s rather then to disparate people as the
text explains.
3) How does the alphabetic communication in online communication make
cyberspace acoustic? How is the online acoustic world different from
the television, radio, or print acoustic world?
The alphabetic communication in online communication make
cyberspace acoustic because of the instant communication people can
have around the world no matter where they are, through live chats
that are available all the time.
The online acoustic world is different from the television, radio,
or print acoustic world because in the text it says that radio and
television, and products of the printing press are cases of
“closed” acoustic space while in online communication
approximates at least part of the openness of the in-person
conversation.
4) Not only do we invent media and media technologies but also we select
their uses in different contexts. What are the two selection
criteria? According to the selection criteria, please discuss what
will happen to our online communication in 20 years?
The two selection criteria are wanting media to extend to there
communications beyond the biological boundaries of naked seeing and
hearing and wanting media to recapture elements that of that
biological communication which early artificial extensions may have
lost as the text says. According to the selection criteria in 20 years our online
communication is that the alphabet may disappear which would be a bad
thing for everyone for many reasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment